Beyond the Bare Minimum: An Introduction to Health and Wellness Standards (WELL, Fitwel)
1. Introduction: From Preventing Harm to Promoting Health
For over a century, the primary purpose of building codes has been to protect us from harm. They are a framework of minimum requirements designed to ensure that buildings are structurally stable, safe from fire, and provide basic sanitation. In essence, the traditional code is a “do no harm” document. But in recent years, a revolutionary new question has begun to shape the future of design: What if our buildings could do more than just not hurt us? What if they could actively make us healthier?
This question is the driving force behind a new generation of voluntary, third-party certification systems known as health and wellness building standards. Led by pioneering frameworks like the WELL Building Standard and Fitwel, this movement represents a profound paradigm shift. It aims to move beyond the minimum safety baseline of the code and create a new benchmark for buildings that are designed, constructed, and operated to proactively support and enhance the physical, mental, and social health of its occupants. This is the shift from an architecture of prevention to an architecture of promotion, creating environments where people can not just exist, but truly thrive.
2. The “Why”: The Overwhelming Scientific Case for Healthy Buildings
The rise of wellness standards is a direct response to a growing body of scientific evidence demonstrating the profound impact that the indoor environment has on our health.
-
The 90% Problem: The simple fact is that modern humans spend, on average, 90% of their lives indoors. The quality of the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the light we are exposed to within these indoor environments has a greater and more continuous impact on our health than many other lifestyle factors.
-
From Sick Building to Healthy Building: The concept first gained traction with the phenomenon of “Sick Building Syndrome” in the 1980s, where office workers reported a range of acute symptoms that were linked to their time spent in a building but could not be traced to a specific illness. This was a wake-up call, prompting a wave of research into Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ). We now have decades of scientific data linking specific building-related factors to measurable health outcomes:
-
Poor indoor air quality, with high levels of CO₂ and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), is linked to asthma, allergies, and significant declines in cognitive function.
-
Inadequate or poorly designed lighting disrupts our natural circadian rhythms, leading to poor sleep, fatigue, and mood disorders.
-
Sedentary building layouts that discourage movement contribute to chronic diseases like obesity and heart disease.
-
-
The Business Case for Wellness: This movement is not driven solely by altruism. There is a powerful business case, particularly in the corporate world. For a typical company, the cost of employee salaries and benefits far outweighs their real estate and energy costs. Therefore, a small investment in a healthier building that leads to a measurable increase in employee productivity, a reduction in absenteeism, and an improved ability to attract and retain top talent can provide an enormous return on investment.
3. A Deep Dive: The WELL Building Standard
The WELL Building Standard is arguably the most comprehensive, rigorous, and scientifically-driven wellness standard in the world. Developed by Delos and administered by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI), it is a performance-based system that marries best practices in design and construction with evidence-based medical and scientific research.
A key differentiator for WELL is its focus on performance verification. Certification is not just awarded based on design drawings and checklists; it requires a series of on-site tests by a third-party agent to measure the actual performance of the building, including air quality, water quality, and lighting levels. The WELL v2 standard is organized around ten core concepts:
-
Air: Implements stringent requirements for air filtration, enhanced ventilation, and the monitoring of indoor air quality to reduce occupant exposure to airborne contaminants.
-
Water: Requires regular testing of water quality and the implementation of filtration systems to ensure water is clean and safe.
-
Nourishment: Encourages healthy eating habits by requiring the availability of fruits and vegetables, providing nutritional information, and designing mindful eating spaces.
-
Light: Focuses on providing high-quality electric lighting and, crucially, maximizing occupant exposure to natural daylight to support healthy circadian rhythms.
-
Movement: Promotes physical activity through the design of prominent and appealing staircases, providing ergonomic workstations, and offering dedicated fitness spaces.
-
Thermal Comfort: Requires meeting high standards for thermal comfort and providing occupants with a degree of individual control over their local environment.
-
Sound: Aims to create productive and calming acoustic environments by managing noise levels, designing for acoustic privacy, and using sound masking systems.
-
Materials: Focuses on reducing human exposure to hazardous materials by restricting the use of thousands of chemicals in finishes, furnishings, and cleaning products.
-
Mind: Supports cognitive and emotional health through the integration of biophilic design (a connection to nature), providing spaces for stress reduction and focus, and promoting mental health awareness.
-
Community: Promotes social equity, inclusivity, and civic engagement within the building and the surrounding community.
4. An Accessible Alternative: The Fitwel Standard
If WELL is the intensive, top-tier standard, Fitwel is designed to be a more accessible, scalable, and cost-effective alternative. Originally developed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the General Services Administration (GSA), Fitwel is now operated by the Center for Active Design.
Its philosophy is rooted in a vast body of public health research. It uses a simple, scorecard-based system where every strategy is weighted based on the strength of the evidence linking it to a positive health impact. Fitwel has a particularly strong emphasis on promoting increased physical activity. Its twelve “Impact Categories” heavily feature strategies such as:
-
Locating the building in a walkable neighborhood with access to public transit.
-
Designing highly visible and appealing “active staircases” to encourage their use over elevators.
-
Providing outdoor amenities like walking trails and seating.
-
Offering on-site fitness facilities and secure bicycle parking.
A key difference from WELL is that Fitwel certification is based on the documentation of these implemented design and operational strategies, and does not require the expensive on-site performance testing. This makes it a more approachable and affordable option for a wider range of building types and budgets.
5. The Impact on the Architectural Profession
The rise of wellness standards is reshaping the practice of architecture in several key ways.
-
New Metrics for Success: The definition of a “high-performance building” is expanding. For decades, the primary metric was energy performance. Now, the impact of a building on the health, well-being, and productivity of its occupants is becoming an equally important measure of success.
-
A More Integrated Design Process: These standards necessitate a deeply collaborative design process. Architects must work more closely than ever with mechanical engineers (on air quality), lighting designers (on circadian lighting), and even with the client’s human resources department to implement the operational policies that are a core part of the standards.
-
A New Focus on Materials Transparency: The focus on healthy materials is driving a revolution in the manufacturing industry. Architects are now demanding that manufacturers be transparent about the chemical ingredients in their products. This has led to the creation of “Red Lists” of harmful chemicals to be avoided and the rise of material certifications like Cradle to Cradle, which assesses a product’s health impact and circular economy potential.
6. Conclusion: From “Do No Harm” to “Do Good”
Health and wellness building standards represent a profound and positive evolution for the entire construction industry. They mark a pivotal shift from the mandatory, “do no harm” philosophy of traditional building codes to a voluntary, aspirational, and proactive “do good” philosophy. They re-center the purpose of architecture on its most fundamental client: the human being. As public and corporate awareness of the deep connection between our environment and our health continues to grow, these standards will likely move from a niche market differentiator to an essential expectation for all high-quality buildings. They are providing the roadmap for a future where our buildings are designed not just to keep us safe, but to actively help us live longer, healthier, and happier lives.
References (APA 7th)
-
International WELL Building Institute. (2020). The WELL Building Standard v2.
-
Center for Active Design. (2017). Fitwel Reference Guide.
-
Heerwagen, J. H. (2004). Investing in People: The Social and Economic Benefits of Good Design. In Intelligent Buildings. Taylor & Francis.
-
Allen, J. G., & Macomber, J. D. (2020). Healthy Buildings: How Indoor Spaces Drive Performance and Productivity. Harvard University Press.
-
Sternberg, E. M. (2009). Healing Spaces: The Science of Place and Well-Being. Belknap Press.